FRPH
Price
$29.98
Change
-$1.37 (-4.37%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
TCI
Price
$29.11
Change
-$0.79 (-2.64%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

FRPH vs TCI

Header iconFRPH vs TCI Comparison
Open Charts FRPH vs TCIBanner chart's image
FRP Holdings
Price$29.98
Change-$1.37 (-4.37%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Transcontinental Realty Investors
Price$29.11
Change-$0.79 (-2.64%)
Volume$7.94K
CapitalizationN/A
FRPH vs TCI Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRPH vs. TCI commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRPH is a Buy and TCI is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FRPH: $30.12 vs. TCI: $29.11)
Brand notoriety: FRPH and TCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRPH: 136% vs. TCI: 252%
Market capitalization -- FRPH: $583.32M vs. TCI: $325.27M
FRPH [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $583.32M. TCI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $325.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRPH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCI is a better buy in the long-term than FRPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRPH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRPH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCI is a better buy in the short-term than FRPH.

Price Growth

FRPH (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while TCI (@Real Estate Development) price change was +4.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRPH is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

TCI is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-3.02% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRPH($583M) has a higher market cap than TCI($325M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than TCI: FRPH (108.57) vs TCI (52.48). FRPH YTD gains are higher at: -0.286 vs. TCI (-15.770). TCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.1M vs. FRPH (21.7M). FRPH has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. TCI (127M). FRPH (179M) and TCI (179M) have identical debt. TCI has higher revenues than FRPH: TCI (47M) vs FRPH (41.5M).
FRPHTCIFRPH / TCI
Capitalization583M325M179%
EBITDA21.7M33.1M66%
Gain YTD-0.286-15.7702%
P/E Ratio108.5752.48207%
Revenue41.5M47M88%
Total Cash158M127M124%
Total Debt179M179M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRPH vs TCI: Fundamental Ratings
FRPH
TCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
8788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
861
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRPH's Valuation (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TCI (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to TCI’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCI (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCI’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's SMR Rating (87) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TCI (88) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to TCI’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TCI (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to TCI’s over the last 12 months.

TCI's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRPH (86) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that TCI’s stock grew significantly faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRPHTCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOTIX30.94N/A
N/A
Virtus EM Opps Instl
HCAYX57.12N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation Y
EHSTX25.32-0.68
-2.62%
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
WCFEX14.30-0.47
-3.18%
WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inv
FSCPX73.20-3.49
-4.55%
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
-0.41%
MMI - FRPH
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
JOE - FRPH
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
HHH - FRPH
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
STRS - FRPH
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
STHO - FRPH
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
More

TCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCI and STHO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCI and STHO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCI
1D Price
Change %
TCI100%
-2.64%
STHO - TCI
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
HHH - TCI
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.47%
JOE - TCI
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
NMRK - TCI
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.52%
FRPH - TCI
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.92%
More