FRPH
Price
$25.38
Change
+$0.92 (+3.76%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
485.41M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KW
Price
$10.92
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRPH vs KW

FRPH vs KW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRPH vs. KW commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRPH is a Buy and KW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2026
Stock price -- (FRPH: $25.32 vs. KW: $10.92)
Brand notoriety: FRPH and KW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRPH: 435% vs. KW: 373%
Market capitalization -- FRPH: $485.41M vs. KW: $1.52B
FRPH [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $485.41M. KW’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KW is a better buy in the long-term than FRPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KW’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KW’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRPH is a better buy in the short-term than KW.

Price Growth

FRPH (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +6.75% price change this week, while KW (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

KW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.36% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KW($1.52B) has a higher market cap than FRPH($485M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than KW: FRPH (476.80) vs KW (91.00). KW YTD gains are higher at: 15.430 vs. FRPH (11.106). KW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 453M vs. FRPH (15.2M). FRPH has more cash in the bank: 97M vs. KW (549K). FRPH has less debt than KW: FRPH (204M) vs KW (4.79B). KW has higher revenues than FRPH: KW (490M) vs FRPH (43.1M).
FRPHKWFRPH / KW
Capitalization485M1.52B32%
EBITDA15.2M453M3%
Gain YTD11.10615.43072%
P/E Ratio476.8091.00524%
Revenue43.1M490M9%
Total Cash97M549K17,668%
Total Debt204M4.79B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRPH vs KW: Fundamental Ratings
FRPH
KW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4475

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KW's Valuation (12) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRPH (100). This means that KW’s stock grew significantly faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

KW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (100). This means that KW’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

KW's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (91). This means that KW’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

KW's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (48). This means that KW’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KW (52). This means that FRPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than KW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRPHKW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRPH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUSPX21.29N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Small Company R3
OSTGX21.38N/A
N/A
Osterweis Opportunity Fund
PMAQX40.33N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap R6
LBFIX61.58N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Select I
EIPFX19.80N/A
N/A
EIP Growth and Income Investor

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
+3.52%
MMI - FRPH
50%
Loosely correlated
+4.46%
MLP - FRPH
38%
Loosely correlated
+11.66%
RMR - FRPH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
KW - FRPH
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DBRG - FRPH
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More

KW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KW has been loosely correlated with DBRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KW jumps, then DBRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KW
1D Price
Change %
KW100%
N/A
DBRG - KW
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
MMI - KW
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.46%
MLP - KW
35%
Loosely correlated
+11.66%
AGNT - KW
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.80%
STHO - KW
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
More