Advertisement
FRPT vs GLAPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRPT is a Hold and GLAPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRPT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FRPT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLAPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRPT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FRPT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FRPT (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.94% price change this week, while GLAPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +12.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+12.85% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| FRPT | GLAPF | FRPT / GLAPF | |
| Capitalization | 5.6B | 4.15B | 135% |
| EBITDA | 41.1M | 387M | 11% |
| Gain YTD | -47.471 | -0.648 | 7,326% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.98 | - |
| Revenue | 767M | 5.64B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 297M | 439M | 68% |
| Total Debt | 425M | 1.01B | 42% |
FRPT | GLAPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GLAPF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPT (94) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GLAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPT’s over the last 12 months.
GLAPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FRPT (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to FRPT’s over the last 12 months.
FRPT's SMR Rating (88) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as GLAPF (90) in the null industry. This means that FRPT’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.
GLAPF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPT (87) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GLAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPT’s over the last 12 months.
GLAPF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRPT (97) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that GLAPF’s stock grew significantly faster than FRPT’s over the last 12 months.
| FRPT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
FRPT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPT has been loosely correlated with BRBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPT jumps, then BRBR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRPT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRPT | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| BRBR - FRPT | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| HLF - FRPT | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
| WEST - FRPT | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| SMPL - FRPT | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| STKL - FRPT | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.24% | ||
More | ||||
GLAPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAPF has been loosely correlated with HNFSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLAPF jumps, then HNFSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLAPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HNFSA - GLAPF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UVRBF - GLAPF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRPT - GLAPF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| GRBMF - GLAPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLUC - GLAPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||