Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRQAX vs RBATX
FRQAX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRQAX vs. RBATX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRQAX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. FRQAX (7.35M). FRQAX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FRQAX (2.64) vs RBATX (2.10). FRQAX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FRQAX (18 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FRQAX (0.70). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FRQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FRQAX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. FRQAX (7.10). RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 19.45 vs. FRQAX (8.40).
| FRQAX | RBATX | FRQAX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.208 | 6.457 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.35M | 3.91B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.10 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 8.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.85 | 17.30 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.40 | 19.45 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.55 | 30.22 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers