Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRQAX vs RBATX
FRQAX vs RBATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRQAX vs. RBATX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRQAX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. FRQAX (7.36M). FRQAX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FRQAX (2.57) vs RBATX (2.02). FRQAX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FRQAX (18 years) vs RBATX (19 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FRQAX (0.70). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FRQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FRQAX (0) vs RBATX (250). RBATX (6.70) and FRQAX (6.45) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 17.12 vs. FRQAX (6.62).
| FRQAX | RBATX | FRQAX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.586 | 9.162 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.36M | 3.94B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 2.02 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 6.70 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.35 | 20.73 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.62 | 17.12 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.24 | 36.88 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers