Ad is loading...
FRQAX vs RBATX
FRQAX vs RBATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRQAX vs. RBATX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRQAX is a Hold and RBATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBATX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. FRQAX (5.91M). FRQAX pays higher dividends than RBATX: FRQAX (2.68) vs RBATX (2.14). FRQAX was incepted earlier than RBATX: FRQAX (18 years) vs RBATX (18 years). RBATX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FRQAX (0.70). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RBATX (8.00). FRQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBATX: FRQAX (0) vs RBATX (250). FRQAX (7.81) and RBATX (7.58) have marching annual gain over last year. RBATX return over 5 years is better than : 18.95 vs. FRQAX (9.59).
| FRQAX | RBATX | FRQAX / RBATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.706 | 2.618 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.91M | 3.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.14 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 7.58 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 9.28 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.59 | 18.95 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.03 | 22.76 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...