Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRQAX vs RDATX
FRQAX vs RDATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRQAX vs. RDATX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRQAX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDATX has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. FRQAX (7.35M). RDATX pays higher dividends than FRQAX: RDATX (2.79) vs FRQAX (2.64). FRQAX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FRQAX (18 years) vs RDATX (18 years). FRQAX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RDATX (0.63). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RDATX (8.00). FRQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDATX: FRQAX (0) vs RDATX (250). RDATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FRQAX (7.10). RDATX return over 5 years is better than : 23.32 vs. FRQAX (8.40).
| FRQAX | RDATX | FRQAX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.63 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.63 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.208 | 6.903 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.35M | 3.91B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.79 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 8.97 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.85 | 19.58 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.40 | 23.32 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.55 | 36.18 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement