Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRQAX vs RDATX
FRQAX vs RDATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRQAX vs. RDATX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRQAX is a Hold and RDATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDATX has more cash in the bank: 3.83B vs. FRQAX (6.99M). RDATX pays higher dividends than FRQAX: RDATX (2.83) vs FRQAX (2.64). FRQAX was incepted earlier than RDATX: FRQAX (18 years) vs RDATX (18 years). FRQAX (0.70) is less costly to investors than RDATX (0.63). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RDATX (8.00). FRQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDATX: FRQAX (0) vs RDATX (250). RDATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. FRQAX (5.29). RDATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.97 vs. FRQAX (8.08).
| FRQAX | RDATX | FRQAX / RDATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.63 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.63 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.653 | 3.624 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.99M | 3.83B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 6.36 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.30 | 12.86 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.08 | 21.97 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.33 | 29.13 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement