FRRPF
Price
$4.73
Change
+$0.04 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
641.2M
GMHLF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
94.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRRPF vs GMHLF

Header iconFRRPF vs GMHLF Comparison
Open Charts FRRPF vs GMHLFBanner chart's image
Fiera Cap
Price$4.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.85%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization641.2M
Gam Holding AG
Price$0.09
Change+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Volume$65.45K
Capitalization94.36M
FRRPF vs GMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRRPF vs. GMHLF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRRPF is a Hold and GMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRRPF: $5.18 vs. GMHLF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: FRRPF and GMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRRPF: 112% vs. GMHLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FRRPF: $641.2M vs. GMHLF: $94.36M
FRRPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $641.2M. GMHLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $94.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRRPF is a better buy in the long-term than GMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRRPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRRPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FRRPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.69% price change this week, while GMHLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRRPF($641M) has a higher market cap than GMHLF($94.4M). GMHLF YTD gains are higher at: 41.667 vs. FRRPF (-16.391). FRRPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 190M vs. GMHLF (-299.5M). GMHLF has more cash in the bank: 131M vs. FRRPF (75.2M). FRRPF has higher revenues than GMHLF: FRRPF (676M) vs GMHLF (433M).
FRRPFGMHLFFRRPF / GMHLF
Capitalization641M94.4M679%
EBITDA190M-299.5M-63%
Gain YTD-16.39141.667-39%
P/E Ratio15.62N/A-
Revenue676M433M156%
Total Cash75.2M131M57%
Total Debt733MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRRPF vs GMHLF: Fundamental Ratings
FRRPF
GMHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRRPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMHLF (83). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (100). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (98). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (60). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMHLF (97). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRRPFGMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCMGX30.450.46
+1.53%
HCM Tactical Growth A
DCCRX27.740.24
+0.87%
Macquarie Small Cap Core R
SEEFX20.970.11
+0.53%
Saturna Sustainable Equity
HAISX16.55N/A
N/A
Harbor International Small Cap Instl
HFERX55.39-0.16
-0.29%
Janus Henderson European Focus N

FRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRRPF and IGIFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRRPF and IGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRRPF
1D Price
Change %
FRRPF100%
N/A
IGIFF - FRRPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
FRMO - FRRPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
HCGI - FRRPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMHLF - FRRPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - FRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

GMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMHLF and SVCTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMHLF and SVCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMHLF
1D Price
Change %
GMHLF100%
N/A
SVCTF - GMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBY - GMHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - GMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
GLAE - GMHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More