FRRPF
Price
$4.73
Change
+$0.04 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
641.2M
HALFF
Price
$144.50
Change
-$0.50 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRRPF vs HALFF

Header iconFRRPF vs HALFF Comparison
Open Charts FRRPF vs HALFFBanner chart's image
Fiera Cap
Price$4.73
Change+$0.04 (+0.85%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization641.2M
Hal Trust
Price$144.50
Change-$0.50 (-0.34%)
Volume$807
Capitalization11.3B
FRRPF vs HALFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRRPF vs. HALFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRRPF is a Hold and HALFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRRPF: $5.18 vs. HALFF: $144.50)
Brand notoriety: FRRPF and HALFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRRPF: 112% vs. HALFF: 33%
Market capitalization -- FRRPF: $641.2M vs. HALFF: $11.3B
FRRPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $641.2M. HALFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHALFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HALFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRRPF and HALFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRRPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HALFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRRPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HALFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HALFF is a better buy in the short-term than FRRPF.

Price Growth

FRRPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.69% price change this week, while HALFF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HALFF($11.3B) has a higher market cap than FRRPF($641M). FRRPF (15.62) and HALFF (15.36) have similar P/E ratio . HALFF YTD gains are higher at: 21.684 vs. FRRPF (-16.391). HALFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. FRRPF (190M). HALFF has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. FRRPF (75.2M). FRRPF has less debt than HALFF: FRRPF (733M) vs HALFF (5.25B). HALFF has higher revenues than FRRPF: HALFF (7.79B) vs FRRPF (676M).
FRRPFHALFFFRRPF / HALFF
Capitalization641M11.3B6%
EBITDA190M5.24B4%
Gain YTD-16.39121.684-76%
P/E Ratio15.6215.36102%
Revenue676M7.79B9%
Total Cash75.2M5.88B1%
Total Debt733M5.25B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRRPF vs HALFF: Fundamental Ratings
FRRPF
HALFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
8593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1565
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRRPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (35). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FRRPF (100). This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to FRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as HALFF (93). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FRRPF (55). This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to FRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HALFF (65). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HALFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRRPFHALFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCMGX30.450.46
+1.53%
HCM Tactical Growth A
DCCRX27.740.24
+0.87%
Macquarie Small Cap Core R
SEEFX20.970.11
+0.53%
Saturna Sustainable Equity
HAISX16.55N/A
N/A
Harbor International Small Cap Instl
HFERX55.39-0.16
-0.29%
Janus Henderson European Focus N

FRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRRPF and IGIFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRRPF and IGIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRRPF
1D Price
Change %
FRRPF100%
N/A
IGIFF - FRRPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
FRMO - FRRPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
HCGI - FRRPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMHLF - FRRPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - FRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

HALFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HALFF and IVSBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HALFF and IVSBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HALFF
1D Price
Change %
HALFF100%
-0.34%
IVSBF - HALFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
CG - HALFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
TROW - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BUR - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
SEIC - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More