Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSAX vs TRIZX
FRSAX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.17B vs. FRSAX (401M). TRIZX pays higher dividends than FRSAX: TRIZX (8.56) vs FRSAX (6.90). FRSAX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: FRSAX (14 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). FRSAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FRSAX (6.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSAX: TRIZX (0) vs FRSAX (1500). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. FRSAX (5.35). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 44.71 vs. FRSAX (26.31).
| FRSAX | TRIZX | FRSAX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.02 | 4,950% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.921 | 1.709 | 54% |
| Front Load | 1% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 4.17B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.90 | 8.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | 7.90 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 30.07 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.31 | 44.71 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.06 | N/A | - |