FRSB
Price
$17.37
Change
-$0.23 (-1.31%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
37.37M
FSRL
Price
$10.00
Change
+$0.30 (+3.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
25.51M
94 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSB vs FSRL

Header iconFRSB vs FSRL Comparison
Open Charts FRSB vs FSRLBanner chart's image
FIRST RESOURCE BAN
Price$17.37
Change-$0.23 (-1.31%)
Volume$600
Capitalization37.37M
First Reliance Bancshares
Price$10.00
Change+$0.30 (+3.09%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization25.51M
FRSB vs FSRL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSB vs. FSRL commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSB is a Buy and FSRL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSB: $17.37 vs. FSRL: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: FRSB and FSRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSB: 47% vs. FSRL: 112%
Market capitalization -- FRSB: $37.37M vs. FSRL: $25.51M
FRSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $37.37M. FSRL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSB is a better buy in the long-term than FSRL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSRL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSRL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRSB and FSRL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.27% price change this week, while FSRL (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

FSRL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSB($37.4M) has a higher market cap than FSRL($25.5M). FSRL has higher P/E ratio than FRSB: FSRL (11.85) vs FRSB (6.64). FRSB YTD gains are higher at: 9.033 vs. FSRL (4.275). FRSB has less debt than FSRL: FRSB (28M) vs FSRL (35.3M). FSRL has higher revenues than FRSB: FSRL (22.5M) vs FRSB (18.6M).
FRSBFSRLFRSB / FSRL
Capitalization37.4M25.5M147%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.0334.275211%
P/E Ratio6.6411.8556%
Revenue18.6M22.5M83%
Total Cash5.6MN/A-
Total Debt28M35.3M79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSB vs FSRL: Fundamental Ratings
FRSB
FSRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
441
SMR RATING
1..100
516
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a9

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSB's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (56). This means that FRSB’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FRSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRL (41). This means that FRSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSB (51). This means that FSRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSB’s over the last 12 months.

FRSB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (51). This means that FRSB’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FRSB's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (42). This means that FRSB’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSBFSRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
29%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NHOLF28.75N/A
N/A
Sompo Hldgs Inc
APTL60.00N/A
N/A
Alaska Power & Telephone Co.
PORBF9.95N/A
N/A
Pola Orbis Holdings Inc
FEEXF0.62-0.01
-1.59%
Ferrexpo plc.
VIVC0.07-0.01
-10.00%
Vivic Corp.

FRSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRSB and KPCUF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRSB and KPCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSB
1D Price
Change %
FRSB100%
-1.31%
KPCUF - FRSB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBOOY - FRSB
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
GPFOF - FRSB
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - FRSB
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
FNRN - FRSB
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRL and KTHAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRL and KTHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRL
1D Price
Change %
FSRL100%
+3.09%
KTHAF - FSRL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXRBF - FSRL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMYB - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBH - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGF - FSRL
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More