Ad is loading...
FRSLX vs PMBPX
FRSLX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PMBPX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$23.06
Change+$0.51 (+2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.05M
FRSLX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PMBPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 28.9B vs. FRSLX (150M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FRSLX (30 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). FRSLX (1.25) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.84). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PMBPX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. FRSLX (-7.28). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.04 vs. FRSLX (-15.16).
| FRSLX | PMBPX | FRSLX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.84 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.84 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.356 | -3.037 | 473% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 28.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.28 | 6.75 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.35 | 21.73 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.16 | 68.04 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.04 | 82.65 | -58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...