Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PMBPX
FRSLX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PMBPX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$28.09
Change-$0.22 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.97M
FRSLX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PMBPX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. FRSLX (170M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FRSLX (31 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PMBPX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). FRSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.15 vs. PMBPX (4.31). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.37 vs. FRSLX (-20.94).
| FRSLX | PMBPX | FRSLX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.83 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.83 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.520 | 5.476 | 137% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 33.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.15 | 4.31 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.78 | 54.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.94 | 40.37 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.08 | 109.43 | -27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers