Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs VMGIX
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGIX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$25.68
Change+$0.10 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.1M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$107.23
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.66B
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. FRSLX (168M). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGIX (0.54) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FRSLX (30 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGIX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.51 vs. FRSLX (3.98). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 62.62 vs. FRSLX (-16.98).
| FRSLX | VMGIX | FRSLX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.19 | 595% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.19 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.848 | 7.407 | -38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 29.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.98 | 18.51 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.77 | 41.25 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.98 | 62.62 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.87 | 158.06 | -26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers