Ad is loading...
FRSLX vs VMGIX
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGIX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$23.33
Change+$0.12 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.01M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$96.82
Change+$0.61 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.72B
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGIX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a StrongBuy and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. FRSLX (156M). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGIX (0.59) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FRSLX (30 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FRSLX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGIX (14.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGIX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. FRSLX (-9.16). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.26 vs. FRSLX (1.98).
| FRSLX | VMGIX | FRSLX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.19 | 616% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.19 | 658% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.850 | -3.604 | 329% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 28.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.16 | 4.47 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.01 | 9.38 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.98 | 100.26 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.63 | 129.96 | -35% |