Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs VMGMX
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGMX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.66
Change-$0.12 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.87M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$124.34
Change+$0.36 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.45B
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGMX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Hold and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. FRSLX (171M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGMX (0.61) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FRSLX (31 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGMX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.23 vs. FRSLX (16.18). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 61.56 vs. FRSLX (-20.56).
| FRSLX | VMGMX | FRSLX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.07 | 1,614% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.07 | 1,771% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.709 | 13.526 | 13% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171M | 32.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.18 | 30.23 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.18 | 44.00 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.56 | 61.56 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.20 | 174.49 | -22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement