Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs VMGMX
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGMX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.51M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$122.40
Change+$0.98 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.66B
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a StrongBuy and VMGMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. FRSLX (173M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGMX (0.65) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FRSLX (30 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGMX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. FRSLX (6.49). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.89 vs. FRSLX (-12.38).
| FRSLX | VMGMX | FRSLX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.07 | 1,614% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.07 | 1,771% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.266 | 11.151 | 2% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 29.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 22.60 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.32 | 58.64 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.38 | 75.89 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.87 | 168.57 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement