Ad is loading...
FRSLX vs VMGMX
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGMX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$23.06
Change+$0.51 (+2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.05M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$105.63
Change+$2.60 (+2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.18B
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGMX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. FRSLX (150M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGMX (0.71) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FRSLX (30 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FRSLX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGMX (14.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGMX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.73 vs. FRSLX (-7.28). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 68.37 vs. FRSLX (-15.16).
| FRSLX | VMGMX | FRSLX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.07 | 1,671% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.07 | 1,786% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.356 | -5.684 | 253% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 27.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.28 | 6.73 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.35 | 15.80 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.16 | 68.37 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.04 | 123.65 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...