FRSPF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.04 (-17.39%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
15.27M
GEODF
Price
$2.19
Change
-$0.02 (-0.90%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
111.15M
Ad is loading...

FRSPF vs GEODF

Header iconFRSPF vs GEODF Comparison
Open Charts FRSPF vs GEODFBanner chart's image
First Phosphate
Price$0.19
Change-$0.04 (-17.39%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization15.27M
Geodrill
Price$2.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.90%)
Volume$3.72K
Capitalization111.15M
FRSPF vs GEODF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSPF vs. GEODF commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSPF is a Hold and GEODF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSPF: $0.19 vs. GEODF: $2.19)
Brand notoriety: FRSPF and GEODF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSPF: 9% vs. GEODF: 20%
Market capitalization -- FRSPF: $15.27M vs. GEODF: $111.15M
FRSPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.27M. GEODF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $111.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEODF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GEODF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEODF is a better buy in the long-term than FRSPF.

Price Growth

FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -26.97% price change this week, while GEODF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.54% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEODF($111M) has a higher market cap than FRSPF($15.3M). FRSPF YTD gains are higher at: 8.086 vs. GEODF (2.817). GEODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.4M vs. FRSPF (-1.07M). GEODF has higher revenues than FRSPF: GEODF (143M) vs FRSPF (0).
FRSPFGEODFFRSPF / GEODF
Capitalization15.3M111M14%
EBITDA-1.07M38.4M-3%
Gain YTD8.0862.817287%
P/E RatioN/A5.90-
Revenue0143M-
Total CashN/A17.6M-
Total DebtN/A8.99M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEODF: Fundamental Ratings
GEODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTX33.050.53
+1.63%
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
DES30.19N/A
N/A
WisdomTree US SmallCap Dividend ETF
FFIU21.87N/A
N/A
Fieldstone UVA Uncons Md-Trm Fxd Inc ETF
UPGR15.38N/A
N/A
Xtrackers US Green Infras Sel Eq ETF
ROUS50.09-0.03
-0.06%
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
-18.22%
ELMTF - FRSPF
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.84%
DTWOF - FRSPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GEODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEODF and USAS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEODF and USAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEODF
1D Price
Change %
GEODF100%
-1.13%
USAS - GEODF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.15%
FQVLF - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
SKE - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
GLNCY - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
FRSPF - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
-18.22%
More