FRSPF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.02 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.27M
GEODF
Price
$2.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
111.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSPF vs GEODF

Header iconFRSPF vs GEODF Comparison
Open Charts FRSPF vs GEODFBanner chart's image
First Phosphate
Price$0.22
Change-$0.02 (-8.33%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization15.27M
Geodrill
Price$2.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.73K
Capitalization111.15M
FRSPF vs GEODF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSPF vs. GEODF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSPF is a Hold and GEODF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSPF: $0.22 vs. GEODF: $2.65)
Brand notoriety: FRSPF and GEODF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSPF: 3% vs. GEODF: 34%
Market capitalization -- FRSPF: $15.27M vs. GEODF: $111.15M
FRSPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.27M. GEODF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $111.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGEODF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GEODF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GEODF is a better buy in the long-term than FRSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEODF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GEODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GEODF is a better buy in the short-term than FRSPF.

Price Growth

FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while GEODF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GEODF($111M) has a higher market cap than FRSPF($15.3M). FRSPF (25.120) and GEODF (24.413) have similar YTD gains . GEODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.4M vs. FRSPF (-1.07M). GEODF has higher revenues than FRSPF: GEODF (143M) vs FRSPF (0).
FRSPFGEODFFRSPF / GEODF
Capitalization15.3M111M14%
EBITDA-1.07M38.4M-3%
Gain YTD25.12024.413103%
P/E RatioN/A5.90-
Revenue0143M-
Total CashN/A17.6M-
Total DebtN/A8.99M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GEODF: Fundamental Ratings
GEODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSPFGEODF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GEODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APPEF0.68N/A
N/A
Appen Ltd.
SMTOF20.70N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
NXHSF0.40N/A
N/A
Next Hydrogen Solutions Inc.
CABPF0.57N/A
N/A
CAB PMTS HLDGS LTD.
ELALF5.80-0.05
-0.85%
EL AL Israel Airlines Ltd.

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
-8.77%
ELMTF - FRSPF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
DTWOF - FRSPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GEODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GEODF and USAS have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GEODF and USAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEODF
1D Price
Change %
GEODF100%
N/A
USAS - GEODF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
FQVLF - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.41%
SKE - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
GLNCY - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
FRSPF - GEODF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.77%
More