FRSPF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.27M
TIGCF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSPF vs TIGCF

Header iconFRSPF vs TIGCF Comparison
Open Charts FRSPF vs TIGCFBanner chart's image
First Phosphate
Price$0.30
Change-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Volume$48.07K
Capitalization15.27M
Triumph Gold
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$447.9K
Capitalization2.03M
FRSPF vs TIGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSPF vs. TIGCF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSPF is a Hold and TIGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSPF: $0.30 vs. TIGCF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: FRSPF and TIGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSPF: 75% vs. TIGCF: 689%
Market capitalization -- FRSPF: $15.27M vs. TIGCF: $2.03M
FRSPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.27M. TIGCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TIGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TIGCF is a better buy in the long-term than FRSPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TIGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRSPF and TIGCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.69% price change this week, while TIGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSPF($15.3M) has a higher market cap than TIGCF($2.04M). FRSPF YTD gains are higher at: 71.429 vs. TIGCF (33.000). FRSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. TIGCF (-1.77M). FRSPF (0) and TIGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FRSPFTIGCFFRSPF / TIGCF
Capitalization15.3M2.04M752%
EBITDA-1.07M-1.77M61%
Gain YTD71.42933.000216%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A5.99K-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TIGCF: Fundamental Ratings
TIGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSPFTIGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACRFF58.25N/A
N/A
Accor SA Ltd.
APELF10.00N/A
N/A
Alps Alpine Co Ltd.
CAPFF1.15N/A
N/A
Capital Limited
BKUTK499.00-11.00
-2.16%
Bank of Utica (NY)
WCUFF0.04N/A
-4.64%
World Copper Ltd.

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
-4.72%
ELMTF - FRSPF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.51%
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
DTWOF - FRSPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TIGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIGCF and YLLXF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIGCF and YLLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGCF
1D Price
Change %
TIGCF100%
-4.32%
YLLXF - TIGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
HDRSF - TIGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
JUBPF - TIGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRSPF - TIGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.72%
TLGRF - TIGCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
More