FRT
Price
$98.73
Change
-$0.68 (-0.68%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.52B
24 days until earnings call
HR
Price
$17.73
Change
-$0.15 (-0.84%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.24B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs HR

Header iconFRT vs HR Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs HRBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$98.73
Change-$0.68 (-0.68%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization8.52B
Healthcare Realty Trust
Price$17.73
Change-$0.15 (-0.84%)
Volume$40.59K
Capitalization6.24B
FRT vs HR Comparison Chart in %
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. HR commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and HR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $98.74 vs. HR: $17.74)
Brand notoriety: FRT and HR are both not notable
FRT represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while HR is part of the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 73% vs. HR: 61%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.52B vs. HR: $6.24B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.52B. HR’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $6.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HR is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than HR.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while HR (@Managed Health Care) price change was -0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.18%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

HR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.09% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Managed Health Care (-0.56% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.52B) has a higher market cap than HR($6.24B). HR YTD gains are higher at: 10.376 vs. FRT (-7.828). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. HR (484M). HR has more cash in the bank: 25.5M vs. FRT (18.6M). FRT has less debt than HR: FRT (4.57B) vs HR (4.97B). FRT (1.24B) and HR (1.2B) have equivalent revenues.
FRTHRFRT / HR
Capitalization8.52B6.24B137%
EBITDA883M484M182%
Gain YTD-7.82810.376-75%
P/E Ratio25.00N/A-
Revenue1.24B1.2B103%
Total Cash18.6M25.5M73%
Total Debt4.57B4.97B92%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs HR: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
HR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6285
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
6694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7978
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HR's Valuation (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRT (74). This means that HR’s stock grew significantly faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HR (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HR’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as HR (94). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to HR’s over the last 12 months.

HR's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (54). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

HR's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (79). This means that HR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTHR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEOYX34.83N/A
N/A
Natixis Oakmark Y
MAFGX46.26N/A
N/A
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Instl
HSCCX2.85N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth C
TSCPX12.45N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
FBCIX79.62-0.12
-0.15%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F2

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-0.67%
KIM - FRT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
KRG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More