FRT
Price
$118.61
Change
+$1.40 (+1.19%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.18B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KIM
Price
$24.31
Change
+$0.13 (+0.54%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.22B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs KIM

FRT vs KIM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. KIM commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and KIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (FRT: $117.21 vs. KIM: $24.18)
Brand notoriety: FRT and KIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 55% vs. KIM: 68%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $10.18B vs. KIM: $16.22B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $10.18B. KIM’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $16.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRT and KIM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -3.79% price change this week, while KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

KIM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.18% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($16.2B) has a higher market cap than FRT($10.2B). KIM has higher P/E ratio than FRT: KIM (28.12) vs FRT (23.68). KIM YTD gains are higher at: 21.944 vs. FRT (19.961). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. FRT (1.03B). KIM has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. FRT (107M). FRT has less debt than KIM: FRT (4.85B) vs KIM (8.31B). KIM has higher revenues than FRT: KIM (2.16B) vs FRT (1.34B).
FRTKIMFRT / KIM
Capitalization10.2B16.2B63%
EBITDA1.03B1.48B70%
Gain YTD19.96121.94491%
P/E Ratio23.6828.1284%
Revenue1.34B2.16B62%
Total Cash107M168M64%
Total Debt4.85B8.31B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs KIM: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
KIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6954
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6867
SMR RATING
1..100
6184
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4939
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (67). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (68). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (84). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (51). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (49). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTKIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONQ45.201.76
+4.05%
IonQ
ILPT9.070.22
+2.49%
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust
AUBN26.140.01
+0.04%
Auburn National Bancorporation
PLSE43.32-1.08
-2.43%
Pulse Biosciences
NXGL0.41-0.02
-3.54%
NexGel

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with AKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then AKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.40%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
KRG - FRT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
REG - FRT
78%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
BRX - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
SPG - FRT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
More

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with BRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then BRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
+0.88%
BRX - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
KRG - KIM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
FRT - KIM
78%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
REG - KIM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
UE - KIM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
More