FRT
Price
$98.73
Change
-$0.68 (-0.68%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.58B
25 days until earnings call
LAMR
Price
$122.20
Change
-$1.02 (-0.83%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.47B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs LAMR

Header iconFRT vs LAMR Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs LAMRBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$98.73
Change-$0.68 (-0.68%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization8.58B
Lamar Advertising
Price$122.20
Change-$1.02 (-0.83%)
Volume$1.52K
Capitalization12.47B
FRT vs LAMR Comparison Chart in %
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. LAMR commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and LAMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $99.41 vs. LAMR: $123.22)
Brand notoriety: FRT and LAMR are both not notable
FRT represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while LAMR is part of the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 49% vs. LAMR: 84%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.58B vs. LAMR: $12.47B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.58B. LAMR’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $12.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $89.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $16.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLAMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LAMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAMR is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LAMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRT and LAMR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while LAMR (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

LAMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.01% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.10% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAMR($12.5B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.58B). LAMR has higher P/E ratio than FRT: LAMR (28.45) vs FRT (25.07). LAMR YTD gains are higher at: 5.308 vs. FRT (-7.203). LAMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.09B vs. FRT (883M). FRT (4.57B) and LAMR (4.77B) have identical debt. LAMR has higher revenues than FRT: LAMR (2.23B) vs FRT (1.24B).
FRTLAMRFRT / LAMR
Capitalization8.58B12.5B69%
EBITDA883M1.09B81%
Gain YTD-7.2035.308-136%
P/E Ratio25.0728.4588%
Revenue1.24B2.23B55%
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt4.57B4.77B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs LAMR: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
LAMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6261
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5018
SMR RATING
1..100
6622
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7943
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAMR's Valuation (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (74). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

LAMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (50). This means that LAMR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

LAMR's SMR Rating (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (66). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LAMR (55). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to LAMR’s over the last 12 months.

LAMR's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (79). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTLAMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGRO80.940.75
+0.94%
iShares International Dividend Gr ETF
FLV74.030.41
+0.55%
American Century Foc Lrg Cp Val ETF
EIRL68.430.35
+0.52%
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
CLOB50.860.02
+0.04%
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
HYKE24.79N/A
N/A
Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF

LAMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAMR has been closely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAMR jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAMR
1D Price
Change %
LAMR100%
+0.98%
OUT - LAMR
80%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
DBRG - LAMR
67%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
AKR - LAMR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
KIM - LAMR
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
FRT - LAMR
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More