Ad is loading...
FRTY vs IMCG
FRTY vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FRTY vs IMCG
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
Price$15.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
Volume$26.94K
Net Assets74.02M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$68.20
Change+$0.39 (+0.58%)
Volume$174.86K
Net Assets2.35B
FRTY vs IMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRTY vs. IMCG commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRTY is a StrongBuy and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.35B vs. FRTY (74M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than FRTY: IMCG (-9.554) vs FRTY (-18.985). FRTY was incepted earlier than IMCG: FRTY (4 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FRTY (0.60). FRTY has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FRTY | IMCG | FRTY / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | -18.985 | -9.554 | 199% |
| Net Assets | 74M | 2.35B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.06 | 1,000% |
| Turnover | 199.13 | 43.00 | 463% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 0.81 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FRTY | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FRTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRTY has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRTY jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRTY | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| ARES - FRTY | 71% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| FIX - FRTY | 71% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| TLN - FRTY | 68% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CAVA - FRTY | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CEG - FRTY | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||