Ad is loading...
FRUSX vs FUGAX
FRUSX vs FUGAX Comparison
Open Charts FRUSX vs FUGAX
Fidelity Advisor Utilities A
Price$44.71
Change-$0.54 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
FRUSX vs FUGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRUSX vs. FUGAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRUSX is a Buy and FUGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRUSX has more cash in the bank: 6.76B vs. FUGAX (1.21B). FRUSX pays higher dividends than FUGAX: FRUSX (1.90) vs FUGAX (1.71). FRUSX was incepted earlier than FUGAX: FRUSX (30 years) vs FUGAX (29 years). FRUSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FUGAX (0.99). FUGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FRUSX (6.80). FUGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRUSX: FUGAX (0) vs FRUSX (1000). FRUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.81 vs. FUGAX (12.36). FUGAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.35 vs. FRUSX (33.67).
| FRUSX | FUGAX | FRUSX / FUGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.99 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.428 | 3.855 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.76B | 1.21B | 561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.71 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.81 | 12.36 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.77 | 25.27 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.67 | 71.35 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.97 | 90.33 | 61% |