Ad is loading...
FRUSX vs FUGCX
FRUSX vs FUGCX Comparison
Open Charts FRUSX vs FUGCX
Fidelity Advisor Utilities C
Price$42.91
Change-$0.11 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
FRUSX vs FUGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRUSX vs. FUGCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRUSX is a Buy and FUGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRUSX has more cash in the bank: 6.6B vs. FUGCX (1.19B). FRUSX pays higher dividends than FUGCX: FRUSX (1.91) vs FUGCX (0.97). FRUSX was incepted earlier than FUGCX: FRUSX (30 years) vs FUGCX (28 years). FUGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FRUSX (1.21). FUGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. FRUSX (6.80). FUGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRUSX: FUGCX (0) vs FRUSX (1000). FRUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.33 vs. FUGCX (15.39). FUGCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.78 vs. FRUSX (26.90).
| FRUSX | FUGCX | FRUSX / FUGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.74 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.74 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.909 | 1.037 | 377% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 1.19B | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.97 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.33 | 15.39 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.15 | 16.76 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.90 | 58.78 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.99 | 73.67 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers