FRZCF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.35 (+23.33%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
NRWRF
Price
$1.07
Change
+$0.18 (+20.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
331.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRZCF vs NRWRF

Header iconFRZCF vs NRWRF Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs NRWRFBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.85
Change+$0.35 (+23.33%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization2.77B
Newriver Reit
Price$1.07
Change+$0.18 (+20.00%)
Volume$2.97K
Capitalization331.17M
FRZCF vs NRWRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRZCF vs. NRWRF commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and NRWRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.71 vs. NRWRF: $1.08)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and NRWRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 28% vs. NRWRF: 486%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $2.77B vs. NRWRF: $331.17M
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.77B. NRWRF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $331.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNRWRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NRWRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRWRF is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -7.44% price change this week, while NRWRF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.49% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRZCF($2.77B) has a higher market cap than NRWRF($331M). FRZCF has higher P/E ratio than NRWRF: FRZCF (18.45) vs NRWRF (7.22). NRWRF YTD gains are higher at: 40.873 vs. FRZCF (9.265). FRZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. NRWRF (45M). NRWRF has more cash in the bank: 92.5M vs. FRZCF (24.6M). NRWRF has less debt than FRZCF: NRWRF (373M) vs FRZCF (2.2B). FRZCF has higher revenues than NRWRF: FRZCF (368M) vs NRWRF (73.2M).
FRZCFNRWRFFRZCF / NRWRF
Capitalization2.77B331M837%
EBITDA275M45M611%
Gain YTD9.26540.87323%
P/E Ratio18.457.22256%
Revenue368M73.2M503%
Total Cash24.6M92.5M27%
Total Debt2.2B373M589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRDA8.140.54
+7.11%
Entrada Therapeutics
OKE82.511.67
+2.07%
Oneok
VIOT1.410.02
+1.81%
Viomi Technology Co Ltd
SPH18.960.12
+0.64%
Suburban Propane Partners L P
LU2.89-0.04
-1.37%
Lufax Holding Ltd

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with STKAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then STKAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
-7.44%
STKAF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
NTSGF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRWRF - FRZCF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
CPAMF - FRZCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

NRWRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NRWRF has been loosely correlated with FRZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NRWRF jumps, then FRZCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRWRF
1D Price
Change %
NRWRF100%
N/A
FRZCF - NRWRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-7.44%
STRW - NRWRF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
PRKWF - NRWRF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
NTSGF - NRWRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - NRWRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More