FRZCF
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
NRWRF
Price
$1.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

FRZCF vs NRWRF

Header iconFRZCF vs NRWRF Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs NRWRFBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$2.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$578
CapitalizationN/A
Newriver Reit
Price$1.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.38K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FRZCF vs NRWRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
FRZCF vs. NRWRF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and NRWRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.99 vs. NRWRF: $1.12)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and NRWRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 374% vs. NRWRF: 232%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $2.77B vs. NRWRF: $331.17M
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.77B. NRWRF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $331.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRWRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NRWRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRWRF is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NRWRF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.34% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRZCF($2.77B) has a higher market cap than NRWRF($331M). FRZCF has higher P/E ratio than NRWRF: FRZCF (18.45) vs NRWRF (7.22). FRZCF YTD gains are higher at: 14.368 vs. NRWRF (5.695). FRZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. NRWRF (45M). NRWRF has more cash in the bank: 92.5M vs. FRZCF (24.6M). NRWRF has less debt than FRZCF: NRWRF (373M) vs FRZCF (2.2B). FRZCF has higher revenues than NRWRF: FRZCF (368M) vs NRWRF (73.2M).
FRZCFNRWRFFRZCF / NRWRF
Capitalization2.77B331M837%
EBITDA275M45M611%
Gain YTD14.3685.695252%
P/E Ratio18.457.22256%
Revenue368M73.2M503%
Total Cash24.6M92.5M27%
Total Debt2.2B373M589%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with NTSGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then NTSGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
N/A
NTSGF - FRZCF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STKAF - FRZCF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRWRF - FRZCF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPAMF - FRZCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+12.17%
More

NRWRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NRWRF has been loosely correlated with FRZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NRWRF jumps, then FRZCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRWRF
1D Price
Change %
NRWRF100%
N/A
FRZCF - NRWRF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STRW - NRWRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
PRKWF - NRWRF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTSGF - NRWRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - NRWRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More