Ad is loading...
FSAAX vs RLBAX
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSAAX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
Price$15.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
FSAAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAAX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FSAAX (4.18B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSAAX (1.80) vs RLBAX (1.28). FSAAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSAAX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.94). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSAAX (17.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSAAX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. RLBAX (3.92). FSAAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.25 vs. RLBAX (32.45).
| FSAAX | RLBAX | FSAAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.31 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.844 | 0.154 | 546% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 234B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.28 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | 3.92 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.78 | 19.69 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.25 | 32.45 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.95 | 44.47 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...