Ad is loading...
FSAAX vs RLBCX
FSAAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSAAX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
Price$15.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
FSAAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAAX vs. RLBCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAAX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FSAAX (4.18B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FSAAX (1.80) vs RLBCX (1.70). FSAAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FSAAX (18 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). FSAAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSAAX (17.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FSAAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. RLBCX (4.39). FSAAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.25 vs. RLBCX (34.93).
| FSAAX | RLBCX | FSAAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.844 | 0.323 | 261% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 234B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.70 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | 4.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.78 | 20.95 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.25 | 34.93 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.95 | 48.02 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...