Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAAX vs RLBCX
FSAAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSAAX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A
Price$16.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.45B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.84B
FSAAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAAX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FSAAX (4.45B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FSAAX (1.67) vs RLBCX (1.56). FSAAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FSAAX (18 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). FSAAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSAAX (17.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FSAAX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.24 vs. RLBCX (9.77). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.23 vs. FSAAX (33.42).
| FSAAX | RLBCX | FSAAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.474 | 8.712 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.45B | 254B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.24 | 9.77 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.24 | 30.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.42 | 35.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.64 | 61.95 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement