Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs OCMAX
FSAGX vs OCMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs OCMAX
FSAGX vs OCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. OCMAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and OCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.41B vs. OCMAX (174M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than OCMAX: FSAGX (1.71) vs OCMAX (1.09). FSAGX was incepted earlier than OCMAX: FSAGX (40 years) vs OCMAX (16 years). OCMAX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. OCMAX (6.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than OCMAX: FSAGX (0) vs OCMAX (1000). OCMAX (102.93) and FSAGX (101.27) have marching annual gain over last year. OCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 135.84 vs. FSAGX (97.32).
| FSAGX | OCMAX | FSAGX / OCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.88 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 115.826 | 127.199 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 174M | 1,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.09 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 101.27 | 102.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 163.67 | 212.81 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.32 | 135.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 351.58 | 336.01 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement