Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs RYMPX
FSAGX vs RYMPX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs RYMPX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$41.87
Change+$0.27 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
Rydex Precious Metals H
Price$168.50
Change+$1.39 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.92M
FSAGX vs RYMPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. RYMPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and RYMPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. RYMPX (115M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than RYMPX: FSAGX (2.25) vs RYMPX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than RYMPX: FSAGX (40 years) vs RYMPX (22 years). RYMPX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). RYMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 452.00 vs. FSAGX (17.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMPX: FSAGX (0) vs RYMPX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.41 vs. RYMPX (54.90). FSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.28 vs. RYMPX (32.14).
| FSAGX | RYMPX | FSAGX / RYMPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.55 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.58 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 70.342 | 68.164 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 115M | 2,024% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.41 | 54.90 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.60 | 94.88 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.28 | 32.14 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.46 | 235.87 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers