Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs RYZCX
FSAGX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs RYZCX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$45.12
Change+$1.23 (+2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
Rydex Precious Metals C
Price$145.80
Change+$4.26 (+3.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.77M
FSAGX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. RYZCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. RYZCX (115M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FSAGX (2.25) vs RYZCX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FSAGX (40 years) vs RYZCX (24 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 452.00 vs. FSAGX (17.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZCX: FSAGX (0) vs RYZCX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.64 vs. RYZCX (55.25). FSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.01 vs. RYZCX (23.23).
| FSAGX | RYZCX | FSAGX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.28 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.33 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 78.560 | 74.741 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 115M | 2,024% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.64 | 55.25 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.21 | 117.53 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.01 | 23.23 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.69 | 234.17 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement