Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs RYZCX
FSAGX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs RYZCX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$40.02
Change+$0.70 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
Rydex Precious Metals C
Price$123.37
Change+$1.64 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets115.03M
FSAGX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. RYZCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. RYZCX (115M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FSAGX (2.29) vs RYZCX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FSAGX (40 years) vs RYZCX (24 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 387.00 vs. FSAGX (17.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZCX: FSAGX (0) vs RYZCX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.23 vs. RYZCX (52.20). FSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 60.17 vs. RYZCX (43.00).
| FSAGX | RYZCX | FSAGX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.30 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 2.33 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 59.967 | 50.284 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 115M | 1,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.23 | 52.20 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.72 | 54.03 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.17 | 43.00 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.47 | 112.18 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers