Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FSCIX (2.37B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCIX: NAESX (1.09) vs FSCIX (0.03). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSCIX (0.95) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSCIX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. NAESX (12.62). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.35 vs. FSCIX (9.59).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.457 | 12.958 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.09 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.07 | 12.62 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.01 | 51.25 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.59 | 32.35 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.95 | 151.07 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement