Ad is loading...
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$28.69
Change+$2.38 (+9.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.55
Change+$8.70 (+9.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FSCIX (1.82B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.62) vs NAESX (1.39). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.70 vs. FSCIX (-23.16). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.35 vs. FSCIX (28.38).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.946 | -19.296 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 1.39 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.16 | -13.70 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.66 | -5.18 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.38 | 56.35 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.44 | 63.14 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...