Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$35.34
Change+$0.11 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.73
Change+$0.21 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCIX (2.02B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.40) vs NAESX (1.23). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. FSCIX (-4.83). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 60.60 vs. FSCIX (33.07).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.534 | 7.501 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.23 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.83 | 9.31 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.89 | 48.29 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.07 | 60.60 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.66 | 133.33 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement