Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCIX vs NAESX
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCIX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap I
Price$33.07
Change+$0.37 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$114.71
Change+$1.11 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FSCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCIX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FSCIX (1.93B). FSCIX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCIX (1.49) vs NAESX (1.28). FSCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCIX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCIX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. FSCIX (-3.58). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 64.94 vs. FSCIX (38.28).
| FSCIX | NAESX | FSCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.17 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.739 | -1.194 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.28 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 9.95 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.19 | 34.26 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.28 | 64.94 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.95 | 102.82 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement