FSCR
Price
$8.00
Change
+$0.50 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.97M
KRNNF
Price
$134.15
Change
-$12.10 (-8.27%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.82B
Ad is loading...

FSCR vs KRNNF

Header iconFSCR vs KRNNF Comparison
Open Charts FSCR vs KRNNFBanner chart's image
Federal Screw Works
Price$8.00
Change+$0.50 (+6.67%)
Volume$6.2K
Capitalization17.97M
Krones AG
Price$134.15
Change-$12.10 (-8.27%)
Volume$150
Capitalization3.82B
FSCR vs KRNNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSCR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSCR vs. KRNNF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCR is a Hold and KRNNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FSCR: $8.00 vs. KRNNF: $134.15)
Brand notoriety: FSCR and KRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSCR: 81% vs. KRNNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FSCR: $17.97M vs. KRNNF: $3.82B
FSCR [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $17.97M. KRNNF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $3.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSCR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSCR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KRNNF is a better buy in the long-term than FSCR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSCR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSCR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FSCR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +6.67% price change this week, while KRNNF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.44%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.92% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KRNNF($3.82B) has a higher market cap than FSCR($18M). FSCR YTD gains are higher at: 14.286 vs. KRNNF (0.000).
FSCRKRNNFFSCR / KRNNF
Capitalization18M3.82B0%
EBITDAN/A416M-
Gain YTD14.2860.000-
P/E RatioN/A16.45-
RevenueN/A4.42B-
Total CashN/A645M-
Total DebtN/A154M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSCR vs KRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
FSCR
KRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7211
SMR RATING
1..100
10058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8865
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KRNNF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FSCR (59). This means that KRNNF’s stock grew similarly to FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

KRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSCR (72). This means that KRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

KRNNF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSCR (100). This means that KRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

FSCR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as KRNNF (53). This means that FSCR’s stock grew similarly to KRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

KRNNF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as FSCR (88). This means that KRNNF’s stock grew similarly to FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSCRKRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSCR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMGAX17.740.19
+1.08%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
SSFRX447.174.39
+0.99%
State Street Equity 500 Index R
SPEDX21.560.10
+0.47%
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
TROCX26.370.06
+0.23%
Touchstone Non-US ESG Equity I
NRCFX12.21-0.01
-0.08%
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate C

FSCR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSCR has been loosely correlated with NFPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSCR jumps, then NFPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSCR
1D Price
Change %
FSCR100%
N/A
NFPC - FSCR
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHHGF - FSCR
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MRSKF - FSCR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHTAF - FSCR
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTWIF - FSCR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRNNF has been closely correlated with WHTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KRNNF jumps, then WHTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRNNF
1D Price
Change %
KRNNF100%
N/A
WHTAF - KRNNF
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
YOKEY - KRNNF
38%
Loosely correlated
+8.50%
PSIX - KRNNF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
IRRHF - KRNNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSCR - KRNNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More