FSCR
Price
$9.90
Change
+$0.40 (+4.21%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.68M
MLSPF
Price
$8.22
Change
+$0.25 (+3.14%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSCR vs MLSPF

Header iconFSCR vs MLSPF Comparison
Open Charts FSCR vs MLSPFBanner chart's image
Federal Screw Works
Price$9.90
Change+$0.40 (+4.21%)
Volume$907
Capitalization13.68M
Melrose Industries
Price$8.22
Change+$0.25 (+3.14%)
Volume$9.16K
Capitalization10.06B
FSCR vs MLSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSCR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSCR vs. MLSPF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCR is a Buy and MLSPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FSCR: $9.90 vs. MLSPF: $8.22)
Brand notoriety: FSCR and MLSPF are both not notable
FSCR represents the Tools & Hardware, while MLSPF is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSCR: 60% vs. MLSPF: 136%
Market capitalization -- FSCR: $13.68M vs. MLSPF: $10.06B
FSCR [@Tools & Hardware] is valued at $13.68M. MLSPF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $10.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $23.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $6.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSCR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSCR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLSPF is a better buy in the long-term than FSCR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSCR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLSPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSCR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MLSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSCR is a better buy in the short-term than MLSPF.

Price Growth

FSCR (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLSPF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.79%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tools & Hardware (+1.08% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

@Industrial Machinery (+2.49% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLSPF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than FSCR($13.7M). FSCR YTD gains are higher at: 41.429 vs. MLSPF (15.320). MLSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 887M vs. FSCR (4.76M). FSCR has less debt than MLSPF: FSCR (15.5M) vs MLSPF (1.8B). MLSPF has higher revenues than FSCR: MLSPF (3.45B) vs FSCR (88.9M).
FSCRMLSPFFSCR / MLSPF
Capitalization13.7M10.1B0%
EBITDA4.76M887M1%
Gain YTD41.42915.320270%
P/E RatioN/A24.84-
Revenue88.9M3.45B3%
Total CashN/A124M-
Total Debt15.5M1.8B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSCR vs MLSPF: Fundamental Ratings
FSCR
MLSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4334
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8534
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLSPF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FSCR (74). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew similarly to FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

MLSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FSCR (43). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew similarly to FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

MLSPF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FSCR (100). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew similarly to FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

FSCR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MLSPF (44). This means that FSCR’s stock grew similarly to MLSPF’s over the last 12 months.

MLSPF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSCR (85). This means that MLSPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSCR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSCRMLSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSCR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIBU46.500.53
+1.16%
Direxion Daily AI And Big Data Bull 2X
TWN50.220.07
+0.14%
Taiwan Fund
AGZD22.32N/A
+0.02%
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF
CWI33.68-0.10
-0.30%
SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
OILD11.50-0.33
-2.79%
MicroSectorsTM Ol&Gs E&P -3X Inv Lg ETNs

FSCR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSCR has been loosely correlated with NFPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSCR jumps, then NFPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSCR
1D Price
Change %
FSCR100%
N/A
NFPC - FSCR
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHHGF - FSCR
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MRSKF - FSCR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHTAF - FSCR
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTWIF - FSCR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLSPF and SPXSY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLSPF and SPXSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLSPF
1D Price
Change %
MLSPF100%
+3.07%
SPXSY - MLSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
VACNY - MLSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
ATLCY - MLSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
FSCR - MLSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBGSY - MLSPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More