Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCSX vs RCGTX
FSCSX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSCSX vs RCGTX
FSCSX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCSX vs. RCGTX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCSX is a Hold and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCSX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. RCGTX (1.91B). FSCSX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSCSX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSCSX (41 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.16) is less costly to investors than FSCSX (0.61). FSCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). FSCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSCSX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.20 vs. FSCSX (-27.66). FSCSX return over 5 years is better than : -31.94 vs. RCGTX (-61.25).
| FSCSX | RCGTX | FSCSX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 2.16 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 2.16 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -21.443 | 21.807 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.53B | 1.91B | 394% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.66 | 23.20 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.61 | 89.05 | -25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | -61.25 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.49 | -56.51 | -114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement