Ad is loading...
FSCVX vs VSIAX
FSCVX vs VSIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCVX vs VSIAX
Nuveen Small Cap Value C
Price$23.15
Change+$1.70 (+7.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.42M
Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$72.72
Change-$3.25 (-4.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.62B
FSCVX vs VSIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCVX vs. VSIAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCVX is a Buy and VSIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSIAX has more cash in the bank: 53.6B vs. FSCVX (234M). VSIAX pays higher dividends than FSCVX: VSIAX (2.27) vs FSCVX (0.61). FSCVX was incepted earlier than VSIAX: FSCVX (26 years) vs VSIAX (14 years). FSCVX (2.03) is less costly to investors than VSIAX (0.07). FSCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSIAX (16.00). FSCVX (3000) and VSIAX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.56 vs. VSIAX (-13.27). VSIAX (69.79) and FSCVX (69.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCVX | VSIAX | FSCVX / VSIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.07 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.07 | 2,900% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.223 | -17.700 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 53.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 2.27 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.56 | -13.27 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.53 | -3.70 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.09 | 69.79 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.21 | 54.98 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...