Ad is loading...
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$29.21
Change+$0.33 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.12M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. FSCWX (249M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.71) vs SSGSX (0.52). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.87). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.12 vs. SSGSX (-14.61). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 104.62 vs. SSGSX (23.96).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.26 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.112 | -13.720 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 5.33B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 0.52 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.12 | -14.61 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.08 | -16.35 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.62 | 23.96 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...