Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$32.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.66M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. FSCWX (256M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.61) vs SSGSX (0.49). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.72 vs. SSGSX (-14.44). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 61.26 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.921 | -4.415 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 4.98B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.49 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.72 | -14.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | -10.47 | -175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.26 | 2.06 | 2,968% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement