Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$30.35
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.14M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.59
Change-$0.23 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.46B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.46B vs. FSCWX (260M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.82) vs SSGSX (0.54). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.14 vs. SSGSX (-12.04). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 102.01 vs. SSGSX (22.59).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.638 | -10.424 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 5.46B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.54 | 334% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | -12.04 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.62 | -8.79 | -189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.01 | 22.59 | 452% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.33 | - |