Ad is loading...
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$33.25
Change-$1.36 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.41
Change-$2.12 (-4.37%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.85B vs. FSCWX (438M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.09) vs SSGSX (0.35). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (8 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (32.00) and FSCWX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.66 vs. SSGSX (4.35). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 52.12 vs. SSGSX (9.53).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.221 | 2.915 | 659% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 438M | 6.85B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.35 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.66 | 4.35 | 498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.53 | -0.70 | -3,235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.12 | 9.53 | 547% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers