Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$33.28
Change+$0.12 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.79M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. FSCWX (269M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.55) vs SSGSX (0.48). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. SSGSX (-8.78). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 87.08 vs. SSGSX (17.67).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.913 | -1.357 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269M | 5.31B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.48 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | -8.78 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.49 | 0.77 | 4,101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.08 | 17.67 | 493% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers