Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs SSGSX
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs SSGSX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$33.88
Change-$0.17 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.25M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.26
Change-$0.32 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
FSCWX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. FSCWX (279M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FSCWX (1.54) vs SSGSX (0.47). FSCWX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FSCWX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FSCWX (23.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: SSGSX (2500) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. SSGSX (-4.47). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 114.21 vs. SSGSX (31.19).
| FSCWX | SSGSX | FSCWX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.26 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.621 | 0.323 | 1,121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 5.51B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.47 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | -4.47 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.19 | 9.05 | 499% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.21 | 31.19 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement