Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs WCMFX
FSCWX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs WCMFX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$33.28
Change+$0.12 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.79M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.71M
FSCWX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. WCMFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Buy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCWX has more cash in the bank: 269M vs. WCMFX (21.7M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: FSCWX (1.55) vs WCMFX (0.00). FSCWX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: FSCWX (9 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). FSCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: WCMFX (100000) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. WCMFX (-20.97). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 87.08 vs. WCMFX (22.90).
| FSCWX | WCMFX | FSCWX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.913 | -5.927 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269M | 21.7M | 1,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | -20.97 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.49 | 15.95 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.08 | 22.90 | 380% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement