Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCWX vs WCMFX
FSCWX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCWX vs WCMFX
Nuveen Small Cap Value R6
Price$32.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.66M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
FSCWX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCWX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCWX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCWX has more cash in the bank: 256M vs. WCMFX (5.92M). FSCWX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: FSCWX (1.61) vs WCMFX (0.00). FSCWX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: FSCWX (9 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSCWX (0.90). FSCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCWX: WCMFX (100000) vs FSCWX (1000000). FSCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.72 vs. WCMFX (-76.30). FSCWX return over 5 years is better than : 61.26 vs. WCMFX (-65.40).
| FSCWX | WCMFX | FSCWX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.90 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.45 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.921 | -71.870 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 5.92M | 4,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.72 | -76.30 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | -67.31 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.26 | -65.40 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement