Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.84
Change+$1.10 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$19.19
Change+$0.33 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.64M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a StrongBuy and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. ICBAX (125M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.88) vs ICBAX (0.50). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. FSDPX (-9.19). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.34 vs. FSDPX (41.68).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.471 | 13.752 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 125M | 594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.50 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.19 | 4.91 | -187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.09 | 25.52 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.68 | 74.34 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.92 | 79.33 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers