Ad is loading...
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$83.56
Change+$0.15 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.19M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$15.23
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.97M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 721M vs. ICBAX (109M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (1.05) vs ICBAX (0.57). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.71). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. FSDPX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX (-15.21) and FSDPX (-15.85) have marching annual gain over last year. ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.06 vs. FSDPX (45.35).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.51 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.51 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.750 | -10.314 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 721M | 109M | 661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.57 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.85 | -15.21 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.07 | -10.79 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.35 | 56.06 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.24 | 3.16 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...