Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$86.73
Change+$0.32 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.33M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$18.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.83M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. ICBAX (119M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.93) vs ICBAX (0.48). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.09 vs. FSDPX (-12.22). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.17 vs. FSDPX (16.11).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.820 | 10.314 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 119M | 571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.48 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.22 | -2.09 | 583% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.29 | 5.41 | -209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.11 | 48.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.18 | 55.71 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers