Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$87.14
Change-$0.85 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets705.26M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$15.66
Change-$0.40 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.32M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 705M vs. ICBAX (114M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.97) vs ICBAX (0.60). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX (-13.52) and FSDPX (-13.99) have marching annual gain over last year. ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.02 vs. FSDPX (55.32).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.700 | -4.801 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 705M | 114M | 618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.60 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.99 | -13.52 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.28 | -5.47 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.32 | 69.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.24 | 11.33 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement