Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$17.19
Change+$0.13 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.51M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. ICBAX (119M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.92) vs ICBAX (0.55). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.31 vs. FSDPX (-3.51). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 68.74 vs. FSDPX (51.04).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.305 | 1.897 | 543% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 729M | 119M | 613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.55 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.51 | -2.31 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.97 | 4.92 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.04 | 68.74 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.08 | 28.22 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement