Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$93.66
Change+$0.56 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$18.48
Change+$0.20 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.41M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. ICBAX (121M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (0.88) vs ICBAX (0.50). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBAX (15 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. FSDPX (-1.15). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.79 vs. FSDPX (36.34).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.56 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.781 | 8.358 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 121M | 614% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.50 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.15 | 4.36 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.15 | 8.59 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.34 | 62.79 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.70 | 51.77 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement