Ad is loading...
FSDPX vs ICBAX
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBAX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$89.12
Change+$1.06 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets738.74M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras I
Price$17.80
Change+$0.23 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.48M
FSDPX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 739M vs. ICBAX (131M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FSDPX (1.21) vs ICBAX (0.65). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FSDPX (38 years) vs ICBAX (14 years). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. FSDPX (47.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBAX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBAX (1000). ICBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.10 vs. FSDPX (-5.47). ICBAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.68 vs. FSDPX (43.21).
| FSDPX | ICBAX | FSDPX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.783 | 4.149 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 739M | 131M | 564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.65 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.47 | 9.10 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.89 | 5.66 | -175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.21 | 48.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.09 | 32.62 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers