Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$17.52
Change+$0.13 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.51M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and ICBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. ICBMX (119M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.92) vs ICBMX (0.75). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (28 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. FSDPX (-3.51). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.65 vs. FSDPX (51.04).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.305 | 1.979 | 521% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 729M | 119M | 613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.75 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.51 | -1.94 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.97 | 6.16 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.04 | 71.65 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.08 | 32.17 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement