Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$86.41
Change-$0.23 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.33M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$18.83
Change-$0.16 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.83M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. ICBMX (119M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.93) vs ICBMX (0.66). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (29 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.68 vs. FSDPX (-12.22). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 50.65 vs. FSDPX (16.11).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.820 | 10.536 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 119M | 571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.66 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.22 | -1.68 | 725% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.29 | 6.65 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.11 | 50.65 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.18 | 60.52 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers