Ad is loading...
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$81.53
Change-$0.23 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets721.19M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$15.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.06M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 721M vs. ICBMX (107M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (1.05) vs ICBMX (0.78). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (28 years). ICBMX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.71). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 137.00 vs. FSDPX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.32 vs. FSDPX (-18.28). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 70.90 vs. FSDPX (55.18).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.25 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.25 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.950 | -12.631 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 721M | 107M | 674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.78 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.28 | -17.32 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.36 | -15.19 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.18 | 70.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.34 | 6.87 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers