Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs ICBMX
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs ICBMX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$94.37
Change-$0.81 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.4M
ICON Natural Resources and Infras Instl
Price$19.02
Change-$0.18 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.57M
FSDPX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. ICBMX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. ICBMX (122M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FSDPX (0.88) vs ICBMX (0.68). FSDPX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FSDPX (39 years) vs ICBMX (28 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSDPX (65.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICBMX: FSDPX (0) vs ICBMX (1000). ICBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. FSDPX (0.13). ICBMX return over 5 years is better than : 70.40 vs. FSDPX (39.01).
| FSDPX | ICBMX | FSDPX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.256 | 11.758 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 122M | 609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.68 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.13 | 8.00 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.49 | 12.11 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.01 | 70.40 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.26 | 63.81 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement