Ad is loading...
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$84.60
Change-$2.12 (-2.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets757.21M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$53.88
Change-$1.31 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Buy and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 757M vs. RYBCX (23.6M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (1.02) vs RYBCX (0.06). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (38 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.71). FSDPX (51.00) and RYBCX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). RYBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.22 vs. FSDPX (-13.64). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 50.42 vs. RYBCX (42.19).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.40 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.189 | 4.765 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 23.6M | 3,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.06 | 1,676% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.64 | -12.22 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.39 | -9.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.42 | 42.19 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.35 | 39.36 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...