Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$90.14
Change+$0.59 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.41M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$59.94
Change+$0.29 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.63M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and RYBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. RYBCX (23.6M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.93) vs RYBCX (0.06). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (24 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.87 vs. RYBCX (-3.79). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.51 vs. RYBCX (31.76).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.258 | 13.781 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 23.6M | 3,017% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.06 | 1,591% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.87 | -3.79 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.46 | 3.83 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.51 | 31.76 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.46 | 66.20 | 38% |