Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSDPX vs RYBCX
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSDPX vs RYBCX
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$86.41
Change-$0.23 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets680.33M
Rydex Basic Materials C
Price$63.11
Change+$0.17 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.49M
FSDPX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSDPX vs. RYBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSDPX is a Hold and RYBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 680M vs. RYBCX (26.5M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FSDPX (0.93) vs RYBCX (0.05). FSDPX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FSDPX (39 years) vs RYBCX (25 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RYBCX (51.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FSDPX (0) vs RYBCX (2500). RYBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.90 vs. FSDPX (-11.95). RYBCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.24 vs. FSDPX (16.62).
| FSDPX | RYBCX | FSDPX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.38 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.094 | 19.476 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 26.5M | 2,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.05 | 1,732% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.95 | -4.90 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.05 | 7.37 | -150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.62 | 23.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.51 | 89.58 | 27% |