Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSENX vs ICWIX
FSENX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSENX vs. ICWIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSENX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. ICWIX (149M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FSENX (1.87) vs ICWIX (1.05). FSENX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FSENX (44 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). ICWIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.34 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FSENX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.09 vs. FSENX (5.06). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 226.21 vs. ICWIX (175.88).
| FSENX | ICWIX | FSENX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.10 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.707 | 20.473 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 149M | 1,187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.05 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 15.09 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 31.91 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 226.21 | 175.88 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers