Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSENX vs ICWIX
FSENX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSENX vs. ICWIX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSENX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. ICWIX (130M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FSENX (2.10) vs ICWIX (1.47). FSENX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FSENX (44 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). ICWIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.88 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FSENX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.49 vs. FSENX (-5.37). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 201.37 vs. ICWIX (182.35).
| FSENX | ICWIX | FSENX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.10 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.719 | 8.619 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 130M | 1,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.47 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.37 | 16.49 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.20 | 41.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 201.37 | 182.35 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement