Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSENX vs ICWIX
FSENX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSENX vs. ICWIX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSENX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ICWIX (143M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FSENX (1.85) vs ICWIX (1.06). FSENX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FSENX (44 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). ICWIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ICWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.34 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FSENX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). ICWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.87 vs. FSENX (-0.72). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 258.23 vs. ICWIX (201.43).
| FSENX | ICWIX | FSENX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.00 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.10 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.401 | 16.313 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 143M | 1,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.06 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.72 | 17.87 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 46.68 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 258.23 | 201.43 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement