FSFG
Price
$31.32
Change
-$0.15 (-0.48%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
218.53M
14 days until earnings call
FUNC
Price
$36.46
Change
-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
236.79M
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs FUNC

Header iconFSFG vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs FUNCBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$31.32
Change-$0.15 (-0.48%)
Volume$19.99K
Capitalization218.53M
First United
Price$36.46
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
Volume$16.01K
Capitalization236.79M
FSFG vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. FUNC commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and FUNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $31.32 vs. FUNC: $36.46)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 87% vs. FUNC: 79%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $218.53M vs. FUNC: $236.79M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $218.53M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $236.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSFG and FUNC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($237M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($219M). FSFG (10.10) and FUNC (9.99) have similar P/E ratio . FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 20.132 vs. FUNC (10.451). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. FSFG (18.6M). FUNC has less debt than FSFG: FUNC (151M) vs FSFG (464M). FUNC (83.7M) and FSFG (80.6M) have equivalent revenues.
FSFGFUNCFSFG / FUNC
Capitalization219M237M92%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.13210.451193%
P/E Ratio10.109.99101%
Revenue80.6M83.7M96%
Total Cash18.6M82.8M22%
Total Debt464M151M307%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
157
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3926
SMR RATING
1..100
4744
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (37). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (39). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (47). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (48). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (84). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSNUY13.820.28
+2.07%
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
MAPGF1.05N/A
N/A
Mapletree Logistics Trust Units Real Estate Investment Trust
DTTLF3.46N/A
N/A
Datatec Ltd. S.A.
FLNCF0.22N/A
N/A
Freelancer Limited
EVKRF0.03N/A
-1.85%
GRID BATTERY METALS INC.

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-0.48%
SHBI - FSFG
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
FUNC - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
UBFO - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
TCBI - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
NWBI - FSFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.22%
CWBC - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
FNB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
SHBI - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
UCB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
WTFC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
More