FSFG
Price
$26.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.29M
7 days until earnings call
HCBC
Price
$30.35
Change
+$0.48 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
37.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs HCBC

Header iconFSFG vs HCBC Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs HCBCBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$26.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.38K
Capitalization115.29M
High Country Ban
Price$30.35
Change+$0.48 (+1.61%)
Volume$953
Capitalization37.46M
FSFG vs HCBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. HCBC commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and HCBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $26.02 vs. HCBC: $30.35)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and HCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 26% vs. HCBC: 63%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. HCBC: $37.46M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. HCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $37.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than HCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSFG and HCBC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while HCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($115M) has a higher market cap than HCBC($37.5M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than HCBC: FSFG (18.62) vs HCBC (8.24). HCBC YTD gains are higher at: 1.977 vs. FSFG (-0.787). FSFG has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. HCBC (8.37M). HCBC has less debt than FSFG: HCBC (5.25M) vs FSFG (405M). FSFG has higher revenues than HCBC: FSFG (82.3M) vs HCBC (20.7M).
FSFGHCBCFSFG / HCBC
Capitalization115M37.5M307%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.7871.977-40%
P/E Ratio18.628.24226%
Revenue82.3M20.7M398%
Total Cash17.5M8.37M209%
Total Debt405M5.25M7,714%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs HCBC: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
HCBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2658
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4873
SMR RATING
1..100
4165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9330
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCBC's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as FSFG (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HCBC’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (73) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (65) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (56) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

HCBC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGHCBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRSB16.500.28
+1.73%
FIRST RESOURCE BANCORP INC.
FLUIF24.81N/A
N/A
Fluidra SA
SRTSF13.94N/A
N/A
Sarantis SA
PEMSF0.02N/A
-1.10%
Pacific Empire Minerals Corporation
ASBRF11.35-1.50
-11.67%
Asahi Group Holdings Ltd.

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+0.31%
SHBI - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
FUNC - FSFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
TCBI - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
AUB - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
WNEB - FSFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More

HCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCBC and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCBC and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCBC
1D Price
Change %
HCBC100%
+1.61%
MCHB - HCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSBK - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
LSFG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
FSFG - HCBC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More