FSFG
Price
$25.75
Change
+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jun 6, 12:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.29M
48 days until earnings call
HCBC
Price
$30.35
Change
+$0.35 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
37.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs HCBC

Header iconFSFG vs HCBC Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs HCBCBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$25.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$400
Capitalization115.29M
High Country Ban
Price$30.35
Change+$0.35 (+1.17%)
Volume$200
Capitalization37.46M
FSFG vs HCBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. HCBC commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and HCBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $25.57 vs. HCBC: $30.35)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and HCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 48% vs. HCBC: 44%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. HCBC: $37.46M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. HCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $37.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCBC is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.99% price change this week, while HCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($115M) has a higher market cap than HCBC($37.5M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than HCBC: FSFG (18.62) vs HCBC (8.24). HCBC YTD gains are higher at: 1.977 vs. FSFG (-3.110). FSFG has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. HCBC (8.37M). HCBC has less debt than FSFG: HCBC (5.25M) vs FSFG (405M). FSFG has higher revenues than HCBC: FSFG (82.3M) vs HCBC (20.7M).
FSFGHCBCFSFG / HCBC
Capitalization115M37.5M307%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.1101.977-157%
P/E Ratio18.628.24226%
Revenue82.3M20.7M398%
Total Cash17.5M8.37M209%
Total Debt405M5.25M7,714%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs HCBC: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
HCBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5686
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4763
SMR RATING
1..100
1737
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCBC's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as FSFG (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HCBC’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (63) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (37) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (54) in the null industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

HCBC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HCBC’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAUG22.97N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug
CRUZ21.88N/A
N/A
Defiance Hotel Airline and Cruise ETF
UBND21.63-0.03
-0.14%
VictoryShares Core Plus Intmdt Bond ETF
FCAL47.90-0.07
-0.15%
First Trust California Muni Hi Inc ETF
SPHY23.40-0.05
-0.21%
SPDR® Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF

HCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCBC and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCBC and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCBC
1D Price
Change %
HCBC100%
+1.17%
MCHB - HCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSBK - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
LSFG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
FSFG - HCBC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More