FSFG
Price
$27.03
Change
-$0.60 (-2.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
188.58M
47 days until earnings call
HWBK
Price
$31.39
Change
-$0.38 (-1.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
216.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs HWBK

Header iconFSFG vs HWBK Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs HWBKBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$27.03
Change-$0.60 (-2.17%)
Volume$8.55K
Capitalization188.58M
Hawthorn Bancshares
Price$31.39
Change-$0.38 (-1.20%)
Volume$4.56K
Capitalization216.78M
FSFG vs HWBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. HWBK commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and HWBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $27.03 vs. HWBK: $31.39)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and HWBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 40% vs. HWBK: 44%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $188.58M vs. HWBK: $216.78M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $188.58M. HWBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $216.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWBK is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWBK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWBK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWBK is a better buy in the short-term than FSFG.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.42% price change this week, while HWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWBK($217M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($189M). HWBK has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: HWBK (10.57) vs FSFG (8.72). HWBK YTD gains are higher at: 12.287 vs. FSFG (3.064). HWBK has more cash in the bank: 21.6M vs. FSFG (20.2M). HWBK has less debt than FSFG: HWBK (192M) vs FSFG (464M). FSFG has higher revenues than HWBK: FSFG (80.6M) vs HWBK (75.4M).
FSFGHWBKFSFG / HWBK
Capitalization189M217M87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.06412.28725%
P/E Ratio8.7210.5782%
Revenue80.6M75.4M107%
Total Cash20.2M21.6M94%
Total Debt464M192M242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs HWBK: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
HWBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
820
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5221
SMR RATING
1..100
4643
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWBK (40). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HWBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (52). This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (46). This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

HWBK's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (49). This means that HWBK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWBK (99). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to HWBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGHWBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CICOY9.020.30
+3.48%
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd.
COPAF0.06N/A
+2.21%
CopAur Minerals Inc.
MEDXF2.20N/A
N/A
Medexus Pharmaceuticals Inc
OKIEY10.90N/A
N/A
OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
HKMPF24.50N/A
N/A
Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc.

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-2.17%
SHBI - FSFG
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
FUNC - FSFG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
UBFO - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
NWBI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
AUB - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
More

HWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWBK has been loosely correlated with MBINM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HWBK jumps, then MBINM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWBK
1D Price
Change %
HWBK100%
-1.20%
MBINM - HWBK
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
FSFG - HWBK
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
FUNC - HWBK
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
UBFO - HWBK
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
FXNC - HWBK
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More