FSFG
Price
$26.96
Change
-$1.46 (-5.14%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
54 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$18.95
Change
-$1.24 (-6.14%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSFG vs PFS

Header iconFSFG vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs PFSBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$26.96
Change-$1.46 (-5.14%)
Volume$7.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Provident Financial Services
Price$18.95
Change-$1.24 (-6.14%)
Volume$974.17K
CapitalizationN/A
FSFG vs PFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. PFS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and PFS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FSFG: $26.96 vs. PFS: $18.95)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 38% vs. PFS: 171%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. PFS: $1.1B
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSFG and PFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.28% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than PFS: FSFG (18.62) vs PFS (8.49). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 65.365 vs. PFS (11.193). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. FSFG (17.5M). FSFG has less debt than PFS: FSFG (405M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than FSFG: PFS (479M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
FSFGPFSFSFG / PFS
Capitalization115M1.1B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD65.36511.193584%
P/E Ratio18.628.49219%
Revenue82.3M479M17%
Total Cash17.5M189M9%
Total Debt405M1.46B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8659
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
4713
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (45) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFS (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (44) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBISX10.54N/A
N/A
DWS Global Macro A
FUFRX23.88-0.58
-2.37%
Franklin Utilities R6
FLCCX42.89-1.13
-2.57%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap C
RYAZX204.89-8.91
-4.17%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value H
RPMAX15.90-1.33
-7.72%
Reinhart Genesis PMV Investor

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-5.14%
CHMG - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
PFS - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-6.14%
MCB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-6.31%
BWFG - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-5.97%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
-6.14%
UBSI - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
-5.62%
BHLB - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
-3.47%
NWBI - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
-5.73%
FCF - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
-5.38%
ABCB - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
-5.02%
More