PFS
Price
$25.09
Change
+$0.40 (+1.62%)
Updated
Aug 3, 01:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.22B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBSI
Price
$48.96
Change
+$0.51 (+1.05%)
Updated
Aug 3, 11:26 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.63B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PFS vs UBSI

PFS vs UBSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PFS vs. UBSI commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PFS is a StrongBuy and UBSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (PFS: $24.68 vs. UBSI: $48.45)
Brand notoriety: PFS and UBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PFS: 136% vs. UBSI: 81%
Market capitalization -- PFS: $3.22B vs. UBSI: $6.63B
PFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.22B. UBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBSI is a better buy in the long-term than PFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PFS and UBSI are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.31% price change this week, while UBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

UBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.56% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSI($6.64B) has a higher market cap than PFS($3.22B). UBSI has higher P/E ratio than PFS: UBSI (13.24) vs PFS (10.28). UBSI (28.490) and PFS (27.672) have similar YTD gains . UBSI has more cash in the bank: 269M vs. PFS (211M). UBSI has less debt than PFS: UBSI (626M) vs PFS (2.8B). UBSI has higher revenues than PFS: UBSI (1.26B) vs PFS (887M).
PFSUBSIPFS / UBSI
Capitalization3.22B6.64B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.67228.49097%
P/E Ratio10.2813.2478%
Revenue887M1.26B70%
Total Cash211M269M78%
Total Debt2.8B626M447%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFS vs UBSI: Fundamental Ratings
PFS
UBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7738
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5839
SMR RATING
1..100
3225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (19) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (32) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (43) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PFSUBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPR29.580.07
+0.23%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2028
RDVI29.200.05
+0.17%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF
PMMR27.15N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - March
TSLO18.28N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF
EVN10.37-0.06
-0.58%
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust