FSFG
Price
$31.81
Change
-$0.65 (-2.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
221.95M
24 days until earnings call
SMBK
Price
$36.61
Change
+$0.16 (+0.44%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
623.11M
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSFG vs SMBK

Header iconFSFG vs SMBK Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs SMBKBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$31.81
Change-$0.65 (-2.00%)
Volume$86.37K
Capitalization221.95M
SmartFinancial
Price$36.61
Change+$0.16 (+0.44%)
Volume$43.41K
Capitalization623.11M
FSFG vs SMBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. SMBK commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and SMBK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $31.81 vs. SMBK: $36.61)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and SMBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 443% vs. SMBK: 86%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $221.95M vs. SMBK: $623.11M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $221.95M. SMBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $623.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the long-term than SMBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than SMBK.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +15.97% price change this week, while SMBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBK($623M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($222M). SMBK has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: SMBK (14.82) vs FSFG (10.26). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 22.012 vs. SMBK (19.044). SMBK has more cash in the bank: 58.3M vs. FSFG (18.6M). SMBK has less debt than FSFG: SMBK (43.7M) vs FSFG (464M). SMBK has higher revenues than FSFG: SMBK (187M) vs FSFG (80.6M).
FSFGSMBKFSFG / SMBK
Capitalization222M623M36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.01219.044116%
P/E Ratio10.2614.8269%
Revenue80.6M187M43%
Total Cash18.6M58.3M32%
Total Debt464M43.7M1,062%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs SMBK: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
SMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3819
SMR RATING
1..100
4737
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9175
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSFG's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SMBK (66). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (38). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's SMR Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (47). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SMBK (49). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (91). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGSMBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HISEF3.30N/A
N/A
Hisense Kelon Electrical Holdings Co Ltd.
NTTDF6144706000.00N/A
N/A
NTT DATA GROUP CORPORATION
NWRLY0.91N/A
N/A
New World Department Store China Ltd.
VDOMF0.07N/A
N/A
Val D Or Mng Corp.
JBPHF0.87N/A
N/A
Jacobio Pharmaceuticals Group Co Ltd.

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-2.00%
UBSI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
OCFC - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
AUB - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
SMBK - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
FFIC - FSFG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
+0.44%
MBWM - SMBK
86%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
PEBO - SMBK
84%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CCNE - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
TRMK - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
SMBC - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More