FSGB
Price
$9.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
VWFB
Price
$11.26
Change
-$0.19 (-1.66%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
25.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSGB vs VWFB

Header iconFSGB vs VWFB Comparison
Open Charts FSGB vs VWFBBanner chart's image
First Federal of South Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Price$9.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$316
CapitalizationN/A
VWF Ban
Price$11.26
Change-$0.19 (-1.66%)
Volume$400
Capitalization25.77M
FSGB vs VWFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VWFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSGB vs. VWFB commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGB is a Hold and VWFB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FSGB: $9.30 vs. VWFB: $11.26)
Brand notoriety: FSGB and VWFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSGB: 93% vs. VWFB: 15%
Market capitalization -- FSGB: $0 vs. VWFB: $25.77M
FSGB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. VWFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSGB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVWFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSGB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VWFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VWFB is a better buy in the long-term than FSGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSGB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VWFB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSGB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • VWFB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSGB is a better buy in the short-term than VWFB.

Price Growth

FSGB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VWFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGB YTD gains are higher at: -3.125 vs. VWFB (-24.883).
FSGBVWFBFSGB / VWFB
CapitalizationN/A25.8M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.125-24.88313%
P/E RatioN/A344.83-
RevenueN/A4.2M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSGB: Fundamental Ratings
FSGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSGBVWFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VWFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APE.X0.5563800.016107
+2.98%
ApeCoin cryptocurrency
SMMU50.260.10
+0.20%
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Actv ETF
UEVM52.00-0.18
-0.34%
VictoryShares Emerging Mkts Val MomtETF
DRUP62.34-0.97
-1.53%
GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF
JETU20.10-1.44
-6.69%
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN

FSGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSGB has been loosely correlated with AOZOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSGB jumps, then AOZOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGB
1D Price
Change %
FSGB100%
N/A
AOZOY - FSGB
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNPQY - FSGB
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
VWFB - FSGB
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
ANDC - FSGB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - FSGB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VWFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VWFB and AOZOY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VWFB and AOZOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VWFB
1D Price
Change %
VWFB100%
-1.66%
AOZOY - VWFB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - VWFB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTPBF - VWFB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - VWFB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - VWFB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More