Ad is loading...
FSGEX vs LICCX
FSGEX vs LICCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs LICCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$14.86
Change-$0.30 (-1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.22B
Lord Abbett International Equity C
Price$15.25
Change-$0.39 (-2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets354.58M
FSGEX vs LICCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. LICCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and LICCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 52.2B vs. LICCX (355M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than LICCX: FSGEX (2.81) vs LICCX (0.49). FSGEX was incepted earlier than LICCX: FSGEX (16 years) vs LICCX (21 years). LICCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). LICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LICCX: FSGEX (0) vs LICCX (1500). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. LICCX (3.01). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 77.51 vs. LICCX (54.01).
| FSGEX | LICCX | FSGEX / LICCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.71 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.71 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.911 | 7.862 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.2B | 355M | 14,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 0.49 | 573% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 3.01 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.76 | 10.30 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.51 | 54.01 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.82 | 23.22 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...