Ad is loading...
FSHAX vs GDIRX
FSHAX vs GDIRX Comparison
Open Charts FSHAX vs GDIRX
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.84M
Goldman Sachs Short Dur T/F I
Price$10.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
FSHAX vs GDIRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHAX vs. GDIRX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHAX is a Hold and GDIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDIRX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. FSHAX (413M). GDIRX pays higher dividends than FSHAX: GDIRX (3.02) vs FSHAX (2.86). FSHAX was incepted earlier than GDIRX: FSHAX (23 years) vs GDIRX (15 years). FSHAX (0.70) is less costly to investors than GDIRX (0.48). GDIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSHAX (41.00). GDIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSHAX: GDIRX (0) vs FSHAX (3000). GDIRX (3.36) and FSHAX (3.32) have marching annual gain over last year. GDIRX return over 5 years is better than : 6.77 vs. FSHAX (6.35).
| FSHAX | GDIRX | FSHAX / GDIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.40 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.48 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.797 | 0.695 | 115% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 413M | 4.77B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 3.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 3.36 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.41 | 8.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.35 | 6.77 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.44 | 13.71 | 83% |