Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHAX vs MTLFX
FSHAX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FSHAX vs MTLFX
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.49M
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$8.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.84B
FSHAX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHAX vs. MTLFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHAX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.84B vs. FSHAX (426M). MTLFX (3.03) and FSHAX (2.94) have matching dividends . FSHAX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FSHAX (23 years) vs MTLFX (34 years). MTLFX (0.72) and FSHAX (0.71) have similar cost to investors . FSHAX (29.00) and MTLFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSHAX (3%) and MTLFX (3%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSHAX: MTLFX (1000) vs FSHAX (2500). MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.48 vs. FSHAX (3.11). MTLFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.19 vs. FSHAX (6.05).
| FSHAX | MTLFX | FSHAX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.59 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.72 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.845 | 3.367 | 84% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 2.84B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 3.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 3.48 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.14 | 11.07 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.05 | 7.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.45 | 18.58 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers