Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHAX vs MTLFX
FSHAX vs MTLFX Comparison
Open Charts FSHAX vs MTLFX
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets423.44M
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity A
Price$7.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
FSHAX vs MTLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHAX vs. MTLFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHAX is a Hold and MTLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTLFX has more cash in the bank: 2.72B vs. FSHAX (423M). MTLFX (3.00) and FSHAX (2.91) have matching dividends . FSHAX was incepted earlier than MTLFX: FSHAX (23 years) vs MTLFX (33 years). MTLFX (0.72) and FSHAX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . MTLFX (30.00) and FSHAX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSHAX (3%) and MTLFX (3%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MTLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSHAX: MTLFX (1000) vs FSHAX (3000). MTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. FSHAX (3.48). FSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.56 vs. MTLFX (-0.07).
| FSHAX | MTLFX | FSHAX / MTLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.59 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.72 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.818 | 1.927 | 94% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 423M | 2.72B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 3.00 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.48 | 4.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.57 | 9.10 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.56 | -0.07 | -7,669% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.59 | 16.93 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers