Ad is loading...
FSHAX vs VMLTX
FSHAX vs VMLTX Comparison
Open Charts FSHAX vs VMLTX
Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond A
Price$9.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.84M
Vanguard Ltd-Term Tx-Ex
Price$10.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.05B
FSHAX vs VMLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHAX vs. VMLTX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHAX is a Hold and VMLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMLTX has more cash in the bank: 31B vs. FSHAX (413M). VMLTX (2.90) and FSHAX (2.86) have matching dividends . FSHAX was incepted earlier than VMLTX: FSHAX (23 years) vs VMLTX (38 years). FSHAX (0.70) is less costly to investors than VMLTX (0.17). VMLTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSHAX (41.00). FSHAX (3000) and VMLTX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. VMLTX (0.46). FSHAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.35 vs. VMLTX (-1.02).
| FSHAX | VMLTX | FSHAX / VMLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.17 | 388% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.17 | 412% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.797 | -0.277 | -288% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 413M | 31B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 2.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 0.46 | 714% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.41 | 1.57 | 470% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.35 | -1.02 | -620% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.44 | -1.42 | -805% |