Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs JNGLX
FSHCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. JNGLX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. FSHCX (1.09B). FSHCX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FSHCX (0.58) vs JNGLX (0.34). FSHCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FSHCX (39 years) vs JNGLX (26 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FSHCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.56 vs. FSHCX (-18.82). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 6.56 vs. FSHCX (-2.67).
| FSHCX | JNGLX | FSHCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.974 | -6.260 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 4.66B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.34 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.82 | -14.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.66 | 5.57 | -353% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.67 | 6.56 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.21 | 6.65 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement