Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHCX vs JNGLX
FSHCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. FSHCX (971M). FSHCX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FSHCX (0.61) vs JNGLX (0.36). FSHCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FSHCX (39 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSHCX (0.67). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FSHCX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.26 vs. FSHCX (-28.57). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.79 vs. FSHCX (-14.10).
| FSHCX | JNGLX | FSHCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.006 | -2.151 | 372% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 4.4B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.36 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.57 | -16.26 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.57 | 10.16 | -281% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.10 | 1.79 | -787% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.31 | 4.93 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement