Ad is loading...
FSIAX vs PONAX
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIAX vs PONAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income M
Price$11.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.44B
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIAX vs. PONAX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIAX is a Hold and PONAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FSIAX (14.4B). PONAX pays higher dividends than FSIAX: PONAX (5.77) vs FSIAX (3.85). FSIAX was incepted earlier than PONAX: FSIAX (31 years) vs PONAX (18 years). PONAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSIAX (0.94). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. FSIAX (72.00). FSIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PONAX (4%) vs PONAX (4%). FSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: FSIAX (0) vs PONAX (1000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. FSIAX (6.64). PONAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.28 vs. FSIAX (17.41).
| FSIAX | PONAX | FSIAX / PONAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.813 | 2.715 | 30% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 107% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 182B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 5.77 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 8.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.28 | 15.86 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.41 | 23.28 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.45 | 46.08 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers