Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIAX vs PONAX
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIAX vs PONAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income M
Price$11.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.86B
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIAX vs. PONAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIAX is a Hold and PONAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 198B vs. FSIAX (14.9B). PONAX pays higher dividends than FSIAX: PONAX (5.69) vs FSIAX (3.67). FSIAX was incepted earlier than PONAX: FSIAX (31 years) vs PONAX (18 years). FSIAX (0.94) and PONAX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. FSIAX (76.00). FSIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PONAX (4%) vs PONAX (4%). FSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: FSIAX (0) vs PONAX (1000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. FSIAX (6.71). PONAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.53 vs. FSIAX (14.12).
| FSIAX | PONAX | FSIAX / PONAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.413 | 7.784 | 82% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 107% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.9B | 198B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 5.69 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 7.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.58 | 23.23 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.12 | 20.53 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.35 | 54.10 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers