Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIAX vs PONAX
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIAX vs PONAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income M
Price$11.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.66B
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIAX vs. PONAX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIAX is a Hold and PONAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. FSIAX (14.7B). PONAX pays higher dividends than FSIAX: PONAX (5.75) vs FSIAX (3.68). FSIAX was incepted earlier than PONAX: FSIAX (31 years) vs PONAX (18 years). PONAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSIAX (0.94). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. FSIAX (76.00). FSIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PONAX (4%) vs PONAX (4%). FSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: FSIAX (0) vs PONAX (1000). FSIAX (6.55) and PONAX (6.37) have marching annual gain over last year. PONAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.98 vs. FSIAX (13.44).
| FSIAX | PONAX | FSIAX / PONAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.830 | 5.504 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 107% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.7B | 188B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 5.75 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | 6.37 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.53 | 19.20 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 19.98 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.01 | 49.63 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers