Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIAX vs PONAX
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIAX vs PONAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income M
Price$11.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.37B
FSIAX vs PONAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIAX vs. PONAX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIAX is a Hold and PONAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. FSIAX (14.4B). PONAX pays higher dividends than FSIAX: PONAX (5.81) vs FSIAX (3.80). FSIAX was incepted earlier than PONAX: FSIAX (31 years) vs PONAX (18 years). PONAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSIAX (0.94). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. FSIAX (72.00). FSIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PONAX (4%) vs PONAX (4%). FSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: FSIAX (0) vs PONAX (1000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. FSIAX (6.38). PONAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.33 vs. FSIAX (13.80).
| FSIAX | PONAX | FSIAX / PONAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.23 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.064 | 3.424 | 60% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 107% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 181B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 5.81 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 7.30 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.21 | 16.17 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.80 | 20.33 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.46 | 47.07 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers